Winning CPG Spend in a Fragmented Retail Landscape

CPG trade spend is at a breaking point. Learn the "Bridge Strategy"—a framework for third-party innovators to win funding by delivering what retailers cannot: true incrementality and brand sovereignty. Stop competing with Retail Media and start selling on top of existing commitments.

Winning CPG Spend in a Fragmented Retail Landscape

Executive Summary: The Opportunity for Third-Party Innovation

For a third-party marketing or loyalty company, the current CPG landscape presents both a significant barrier and a massive opportunity. CPG manufacturers are currently locked into a high-stakes value exchange with retailers, where trade spend—often their second-largest profit and loss (P&L) expense—is being stretched to its breaking point. As an outside partner, you are not just selling a platform; you are competing against deep-seated legacy costs and the aggressive expansion of Retail Media Networks. To win, you must position your solution as the necessary bridge that delivers what retailers cannot: true incrementality, brand sovereignty, and cross-channel attribution.

This white paper outlines the three distinct layers of the trade spend ecosystem and provides a strategic roadmap for third parties to successfully sell on top of existing retailer commitments.

The Old Guard: We begin by defining the foundational table stakes of retail. These are the defensive, non-negotiable costs—from slotting fees to logistics penalties—that CPGs pay simply to exist on the shelf.

The High-Margin Evolution: We explore how retailers have pivoted from distribution partners to media conglomerates. By monetizing first-party data and digital search, retailers are forcing brands to move funds from sales to high-margin marketing tactics.

The Rise of Complexity: We analyze the fragmentation caused by independent loyalty apps, data suppliers, and managed service firms all competing for the same dollar. This section highlights the attribution crisis facing modern Account Managers.

The Strategic Recommendation: Finally, we detail the Bridge Strategy—a four-part framework for third-party companies to prove non-cannibalized growth, build brand equity, and leverage the data loop to secure CPG funding in a maxed-out market.

The following analysis provides the market context and tactical language required to turn these industry challenges into a compelling sales narrative.


READ FULL ARTICLE BELOW


I. The Old Guard: Traditional Trade Spend Table Stakes

Despite the digital revolution, the foundational commercial engine of retail still relies on a series of legacy funding mechanisms. These are the traditional line items that CPG Account Managers navigate to ensure product viability on the shelf. Traditionally, these costs are viewed as a tax to play in the retail space—the foundational expenses that ensure a product is physically present and priced correctly.

Slotting Fees: The capital required to buy into a retailer’s planogram.

Scan Downs and Bill-Backs: Funds that bridge the gap between a brand's MSRP and the retailer's promotional price point.

Display and Merchandising Allowances: Funding for off-shelf placement—such as end-caps and lobby stacks.

Logistics Compliance and OTIF: Non-negotiable deductions for supply chain delivery misses.

Unsaleables and Swell Allowances: A fixed percentage of the trade budget set aside to handle damaged or expired goods.

Impact on Spend: For the CPG, this category represents the non-negotiable tax of retail. Because these funds are tied to the physical movement and placement of goods, they are often the first dollars committed during a Joint Business Planning (JBP) session. This creates a high baseline of spend that is purely defensive; it protects current distribution but rarely drives new, incremental growth.


II. The Retailer as a High-Margin Media Platform

The most significant shift in the industry is the evolution of the retailer from a distribution partner to a sophisticated media conglomerate. Retailers have realized that while selling groceries has razor-thin margins, selling shopper data and digital eyeballs carries margins exceeding 70%.

Monetizing First-Party Data: Charging CPGs for the privilege of using verified purchase data to target shoppers on retailer apps and websites.

Sponsored Search and Placements: Prioritizing search results based on who pays, forcing brands to spend marketing dollars to remain visible in digital categories they already dominate on the physical shelf.

Creating Digital Real Estate: Installing digital cooler doors or entrance screens to create new advertising inventory within the store.

Impact on Spend: This shift has moved trade spend from a sales-driven cost center to a strategic investment. CPGs are no longer just funding a price point; they are funding an influence strategy. While these investments offer better targeting than traditional circulars, they often cannibalize the funds previously used for price reductions, forcing Account Managers to choose between being the cheapest product on the shelf or the most visible product on the app.


III. The Rise of Third-Party Complexity in Allocating Trade Funds

Adding to the challenge is a fragmented marketplace where third-party intermediaries are now bypassing retailers to compete for the same CPG dollars. This creates a strategic dilemma: how to allocate limited funds across a landscape where the retailer, the media provider, and the data supplier are all claiming to be the key to the shopper.

Independent Loyalty and Rewards Platforms: Companies like Fetch or Ibotta offer cross-retailer influence. They provide a layer of loyalty that sits on top of the store, allowing CPGs to reach shoppers regardless of where they choose to transact.

Third-Party Data and Analytics Providers: Beyond the retailer’s own reporting, a host of data suppliers now sell granular shopper insights and predictive models. These platforms offer a more holistic view of the consumer but require their own dedicated investment.

Managed Service Media Firms: Specialized agencies and tech platforms now exist solely to manage a brand's presence within Retail Media Networks. They offer the sophistication that internal CPG teams may lack, but add another layer of cost and coordination.

Impact to Spend: With so many players—Retailer, Media Network, and Third-Party App—all claiming credit for a single sale, CPGs are struggling with attribution. The complexity of these overlapping systems makes it difficult to determine which dollar actually drove an incremental purchase versus which dollar simply rewarded a shopper who was already buying the brand. This fragmentation often leads to inefficient spending, where manufacturers pay multiple times to influence the same shopper journey.


IV. Strategic Recommendation: Selling On Top of Retailer Spend

To successfully sell a loyalty or marketing program to a CPG that is already maxed out on spend with a retailer, you cannot sell a tactic. You must sell incrementality through a Bridge Strategy. The goal is to demonstrate that your program surpasses what the retailer’s own platform can achieve.

1. Prove Non-Cannibalized Growth Most retail trade spend subsidizes shoppers who were already planning to buy the product. Your recommendation must demonstrate how your program reaches a new consumer or a competitor’s shopper that the retailer’s internal circular fails to touch. By focusing on household acquisition rather than just subsidizing existing volume, you move from a cost center to a growth engine.

2. Focus on Brand Equity, Not Just Volume Retailers prioritize the health of the category; the CPG prioritizes the health of their specific brand. Position your program as a vehicle to build brand-direct loyalty that the CPG owns, rather than just buying a unit move that the retailer owns. This shift in ownership allows the manufacturer to cultivate a long-term relationship with the consumer that persists regardless of shifts in retail shelf placement.

3. Leverage the Data Loop Retailer trade spend is often a black box, offering limited visibility into the shopper's true motivation. Provide superior transparency. While the retailer tells the CPG how much they sold, your program should explain why the shopper bought it and what they are likely to purchase next. Closing the loop with actionable insights turns a one-time promotion into a repeatable strategic advantage.

4. The Omnichannel Hook Retailers are often siloed between online and in-store execution teams, leading to a fragmented consumer experience. Position your program as the connective tissue that follows the shopper from initial digital discovery to the physical aisle. By providing a continuous line of influence that bridges the digital and physical worlds, you offer a holistic solution that a single end-cap or static banner cannot match.


Conclusion: From Defensive Tax to Strategic Growth

The era of predictable trade spend is over. As retailers prioritize high-margin media revenue and third-party platforms further fragment the shopper journey, CPG manufacturers must move beyond defensive spending. The winners in this new landscape will be the partners who stop competing for a slice of the existing retailer budget and instead prove they can grow the total pie. By focusing on true incrementality, brand sovereignty, and seamless omnichannel influence, third-party innovators can transform trade spend from a mandatory tax into a powerful engine for long-term loyalty and measurable ROI.